The voice of Gevey verbs
The concept of voice in Gevey has little to do with grammatical necessity, but rather social and dialectal mores. Nevertheless, it is essential to get the voice of each clause's verb correct.
Three voices are used in Gevey: active, incidental and stative. While the use of the stative voice can seem idiosyncratic (and indeed varies between geographical regions and even peer groups), the use of the active and incidental voices is rather simpler, once the concept of subject causation is understood
Subject causation
Gevey is, in many ways, a very precise language - with the precision being coded into the grammar of the language. A good example of this is subject causation.
The subject of a clause (for more information on subjects, direct objects and indirect objects, refer to the noun section of this grammar) directs the action of the principal verb when the clause is using interactive mode. In Gevey, a distinction is made between actions that are willfully instigated by a subject, and those that are the result of a previous action.
The effect of this distinction is that Gevey divides the world of objects (remember, a subject is just an object that is directing the action of a verb) into two groups:
- those objects that are capable of instigating an action through their own choice or volition - known as causative objects
- Those objects that, while not able to instigate an action through their own choice or volition, are still able to direct an action (usually these objects are responding to an earlier action) - known as applicative objects
It is important to understand that the distinction is whether an object could instigate an action, not whether it is instigating an action in this particular situation. In fact the division between causative and applicative objects is very simple - an object will be applicative unless it is:
- an animate person or animal (but not a plant)
- a controlling thought or emotion capable of driving the action of a person or animal
- a deity or other anthropormorphic manifestation
in which case, the object will be causative.
Applicative subjects are restricted to just two voices: the stative voice and the incidental voice. Applicative subjects are incapable of instigating actions of their own volition (there will always be a causative subject at the start of any chain of events: a stone rolls down a hill because it is kicked by a goat, the goat accidently dislodged the stone, or perhaps deliberately kicked it, who knows the purposes of a goat), so an applicative subject's principal verb will never take the active voice.
Causative subjects will also react to previous actions, and may not actively instigate their action. However, a causative subject's principal verb will normally take the active voice. When a causative subject uses a principal verb in the incidental voice, it is because the speaker or writer wants to highlight the accidental or non-intentional nature of the action in the clause.
Note that all inanimate objects are also applicative objects. However, not all internal, external or simple objects are causative objects. The test which is used to divide the two groups is the ability of the object to instigate action.
Demonstrating the voice of the principal verb
A Gevey principal verb can be either a simple construction (just the action verb itself, properly conjugated), or it can be a compound construction (an auxiliary verb which is conjugated, followed by the correct action verb participle).
The voice of a Gevey verb is demonstrated by the verb's construction:
Stative voice | compound construction, using the auxiliary verb 'ben', to have |
Incidental voice | compound construction, using the auxiliary verb 'sen', to be |
Active voice | simple construction |
The simplest way of demonstrating the use of voice is through some examples. The following examples show the differing use of the active and incidental voice:
- ƍčĊŖČĂ ơČĈ ŗŎČĂŪČāƐ ŴďĀĖƏČĀĚČĂ
- lɔɪ.fe jʊ fre.sæl ʃɑ.blæ.te
- loife yu fresal caablate
- the man broke the chair (causative subject, active voice verb)
- ƍčĊŖČĂ ơČĈ ŗŎČĂŪČāƐ ŪČĂğČĂ ŴďĀĖƏČāŀĚČĄ
- lɔɪ.fe jʊ fre.sæl se.de ʃɑ.blæn.tɪ
- loife yu fresal sede caablanti
- the man [accidently] broke the chair (causative subject, incidental voice verb)
- ŗŎČăŭƍČĈ ŪČĂğČĈ ŴďĀĖƏČāŀĚČĄ
- fres.lʊ se.dʊ ʃɑ.blæn.tɪ
- freslu sedu caablanti
- the chair broke (applicative subject, incidental voice verb)
- ĚČĈūŎČĂ ơČĂ ƍčċř ěŎČĀƒČĀĚČĂ
- tʊ.sre je lɔɪf træ.ɫæ.te
- tusre ye loif traljate
- the dog bit the man (causative subject, active voice verb)
- ĚČĈūŎČĂ ơČĂ ƍčċř ŪČĂğČĂ ěŎČĀƒČāŀĚČĄ
- tʊ.sre je lɔɪf se.de træ.ɫæn.tɪ
- tusre ye loif sede traljanti
- the dog nipped the man (causative subject, incidental voice verb)
- ơČĂ ƍčċř ŪČĂğČĂ ěŎČĀƒČāŀĚČĄ
- je lɔɪf se.de træ.ɫæn.tɪ
- ye loif sede traljanti
- the man got bitten (no subject, incidental voice verb)
- ƍčĊŖČĂ ơČĂ ĚČĈŪĎăŏ ŰėČĂĩČĀĚČĂ
- lɔɪ.fe je tʊ.sɜr zbe.ʤæ.te
- loife ye tuseir zbedxate
- the man killed the dog (causative subject, active voice verb)
- ƍčĊŖČĂ ơČĂ ĚČĈŪĎăŏ ŪČĂğČĂ ŰėČĂĩČāŀĚČĄ
- lɔɪ.fe je tʊ.sɜr se.de zbe.ʤæn.tɪ
- loife ye tuseir sede zbedxanti
- the man [unintentionally] killed the dog (causative subject, incidental voice verb)
Use of the stative voice may seem to be a minefield for the uninitiated. Indeed, the tasks performed by the stative voice can often vary depending on the origin of the speaker, or even their social group or age. Uncontroversial (and relatively stable) uses of the stative voice include:
- defining or commenting on routine, undirected actions of applicative objects
- assigning states to (usually applicative) subjects - an extreme demonstration of equative assignation of descriptions to objects, which is described on the Gevey modifiers webpage
- in a storytelling context, scene setting descriptions within which the subsequent action will take place
Some examples of using the stative voice:
- ĚČĈūŎČĈ ĕČĂğČĈ ŠčĈƫČăŀğČĊ ŹČĈįƏČąƤƈčĄĚČĉēų
- tʊ.srʊ be.dʊ tʲʌ.zden.daʊ ʒʊ.klɪj.haɪ.tʊbz
- tusru bedu tjuezdendou xukliyhietubz
- the dog-carcass rotted in the street (applicative subject, stative voice verb)
- ơČĈ ƉČĆŪČăĻ ƍčĊŖČăŷ ůČĂƺČĀĚčĂ ğČĆƦČĀőďĊŪČĉıŮ
- jʊ ʰɒ.sem lɔɪ.feʃ ze.tsæ.tī dɒ.stæ.ɹɑ̄.sʊks
- yu ósem loifec zetsatee dostarjuasuks
- the men sailed the boat out of the port (causative subject, active voice verb)
- ƉČĆŪČĂĸČĈ ŪČĂğČĈ ůČĂƺČāŀĚČĄ ğČĆƦČĀőďĊŪČĉıŮ
- ʰɒ.se.mʊ se.dʊ ze.tsæn.tɪ dɒ.stæ.ɹɑ̄.sʊks
- ósemu sedu zetsanti dostarjuasuks
- the boat sailed out of the port (applicative subject, incidental voice verb)
- ƉČĆŪČĂĸČĈ ĕČĂğČĈ ůČĂƺČāŀĚČĄ ūƙČĀĸďĀƍČăıŮ
- ʰɒ.se.mʊ be.dʊ ze.tsæn.tɪ sʍæ.mɑ.leks
- ósemu bedu zetsanti swamaaleks
- the boat sailed on the sea (applicative subject, stative voice verb)
- ơČĈ ƺčċƐ ƍčĊŖČĂ šƏčĀĪƞČĀĚČĂ ŹČĈŪČċřƗČĉēų
- jʊ tsɔɪl lɔɪ.fe tʲleɪ.ʤwæ.te ʒʊ.saʊf.ʍʊbz
- yu tsoil loife tjlaedxwjate xusoufwubz
- the tree was grown on the mountain by the man (causative subject, active voice verb)
- ƺčĊƍČĈ ŪČĂğČĈ šƏčĀĪƞČāŀĚČĄ ŹČĈŪČċřƗČĉēų
- tsɔɪ.lʊ se.dʊ tʲleɪ.ʤwæn.tɪ ʒʊ.saʊf.ʍʊbz
- tsoilu sedu tjlaedxwjanti xusoufwubz
- the tree grew on the mountain (applicative subject, incidental voice verb)
- ŌČāĘijčĄĚČĈ ơČĈ ŪČĊŖČĉƚIJ ĕČĂğČĈ ĽčĊƍčĈŗƏČāŀĚČĄ
- ræb.gaɪ.tʊ jʊ saʊ.fʊʍk be.dʊ nɔɪ.lʌ.flæn.tɪ
- rabgietu yu soufuwk bedu noilueflanti
- the forest covered [grew across] the mountain (applicative subject, stative voice verb)
- ŪČċřƗČĈ ĩČĀŌčĈěƏČĈ ŜġČĈ, ŪČċřƗČĈ ĩČĀŌčĈěƏČĈ ŪČĂğČĈ ŌČĊ
- saʊf.ʍʊ ʤæ.rʌ.tlʊ vdʊ, saʊf.ʍʊ ʤæ.rʌ.tlʊ se.dʊ raʊ
- soufwu dxaruetlu vdu, or soufwu dxaruetlu sedu rou
- the mountain was big (applicative subject, equative verb)
- ŪČċřƗČĈ ĩČĀŌčĈěƏČĈ ĕČĂğČĈ ŌČĊ
- saʊf.ʍʊ ʤæ.rʌ.tlʊ be.dʊ raʊ
- soufwu dxaruetlu bedu rou
- the mountain had always been big [posesses-bigness] (applicative subject, stative verb)
There is no passive voice in Gevey
Many languages, including Ramajal, use a voice called the passive voice to indicate situations where the subject of the clause is receiving the action of the verb, rather than directing the action. There is no such thing as a passive voice in Gevey. There are no circumstances in which the subject of a clause can receive an action of a verb, except when that subject is carrying out the action on itself (in which case a reflexive personal pronoun will be used as the direct object of the clause)
The most common use of the passive voice in Ramajal is to give prominence to the object receiving the action of the verb by making it the subject of the clause and casting the verb into the passive voice. Gevey uses focus to achieve a similar effect:
- loife yu fresal caablate (Gevey active voice, subject in primary focus)
- the man broke the chair (Ramajal active voice)
- yu fresal loife caablate (Gevey active voice, direct object in primary focus)
- the chair was broken by the man (Ramajal passive voice)
- tusre ye loif traljate (Gevey active voice, subject in primary focus)
- the dog bit the man (Ramajal active voice)
- ye loif tusre traljate (Gevey active voice, direct object in primary focus)
- the man was bitten by the dog (Ramajal passive voice)
- loife ye tuseir zbedxate (Gevey active voice, subject in primary focus)
- the man killed the dog (Ramajal active voice)
- ye tuseir loife zbedxate (Gevey active voice, direct object in primary focus)
- the dog was killed by the man (Ramajal passive voice)
While this system works when both subject and direct object are "new information" (and thus occur before the verb), it is a less successful strategy when new information (the comment) is mixed with old information (the topic, which generally follows the verb).
Most old information in Gevey is supplied in the form of pronouns placed at the end of the clause. When more than one pronoun is present, then the final pronoun is said to be in weak focus. Weak focus can also be switched on by raising the intonation on the final word. More information on the concept of focus can be found on the Gevey focus webpage.
Weak focus is (as its name implies) weaker than primary and active focus. Thus logically a direct object in primary focus carries more emphasis that a pronoun in weak focus. So, the following clause would appear to be a passive construction:
- ye tuseir zbedxate ke!
- he killed the dog or the dog was killed by him (Gevey active voice, subject in weak focus and direct object in clear focus)
Gevey speakers overcome this problem by bringing into play a hierarchy of animacy for subject pronouns in weak focus.
- First and second person pronouns in weak focus are held to have stronger emphasis than any object in primary or active focus.
- Third person animate pronouns in weak focus will only have stronger emphasis than the object in primary or active focus if it is higher up the animacy scale - which goes: family member; important personage; friend; stranger; bird or animal (second genesis lifeform); creature (first genesis lifeform)
- Inanimate pronouns never have a stronger emphasis than any object in primary or active focus.
Now, when a Gevey speaker wants to shift the emphasis of the clause away from the subject towards the direct object, all they have to do is emphasise the direct object using the focus promoter mark.
- he broke the chair (Ramajal active voice)
- yu fresal caablate ke! (Gevey active voice: animate subject pronoun in weak focus - "chair" is lower than "he" in the animacy hierarchy)
- the chair was broken by him (Ramajal passive voice)
- gu fresal caablate ke! (Gevey active voice: animate subject pronoun in weak focus; "chair" is focus promoted above "him")
- the dog bit him (Ramajal active voice)
- tusre traljate kiy! (Gevey active voice: animate direct object in weak focus is less emphasised than subject in clear focus)
- he was bitten by the dog (Ramajal passive voice)
- tusre traljate ga kiy! (Gevey active voice: animate direct object in weak focus is focus promoted above the subject in clear focus)
- he killed it (Ramajal active voice)
- zbedxate kiy ke! (Gevey active voice: subject - ke, the man - in weak focus)
- it was killed by him (Ramajal passive voice)
- zbedxate ke kiy! (Gevey active voice: subject - ke, the man - unfocussed; direct object - kiy, the dog - in weak focus.)